Electricity usage in the Bay Area and the impacts of COVID

On this page, we explore how electricity use in the Bay Area varies over space and time, with a particular emphasis on the impacts of COVID on residential and commercial electricity use.

First, let’s take a look at total energy use across the Bay Area, separated by residential and commercial uses.

We can see a clear annual cycle in residential gas usage, with a maximum in wintertime and a minimum in summertime. This makes sense given than gas is used for heating in most homes.

There is a smaller but clearly semiannual cycle in residential electricity, peaking in both winter and summer. I expect this is due to residential heating and cooling from electrical systems such as air conditioning units.

Commercial electricity and gas consumption are out of phase, with largest electricity use and lowest gas use in summer. The explanation for this is not as immediately obvious. I also wonder what caused the large peak in September, 2017 in both commercial electrical and gas use.

We can also observe from the time series that commercial gas use has been increasing slowly over time - and that there is a visible decline in commercial electricity use in the spring of 2020.

Let’s take a closer look at how COVID has changed patterns of energy use across the Bay Area. Here’s what average springtime residential electricity use looked like in 2019, the year before the pandemic hit:

Average electricity use varies from about 800 to 3,000 kBTU, with a few outlier counties that may be issues with the PG&E data. The ultra-wealthy city of Atherton sticks out like a sore thumb. Palo Alto is on its own electrical grid, and so doesn’t show up in PG&E’s data.

There seems to be a slight trend towards higher electricity use with distance from the Bay. The Bay naturally helps regulate temperatures, so less heating and cooling are necessary for houses close to the water.

Now look at the change in the average from 2019 to 2020.

Other than Napa, Sonoma and some other counties further north along the coast, almost the entire Bay Area shows increases in per capita residential electricity use. Some of the greatest increases are in the delta area, near Antioch, Oakley and Brentwood. In Atherton, electricity use has increased by an additional 287 kBTU.

We can also look at the data in terms of total electricity use by zipcode and the percent change from 2019 to 2020.

The Antioch area is particularly noticeable in this rendition.

The next map shows the % change in residential electricity use

The map of % change in total electricity use makes a few additional areas stick out. SOMA in SF, Redwood City, and Mountain View all have relatively high % changes. I would expect that this is because of the large number of people working in tech who live in these areas and transitioned to working from home during the pandemic.

In contrast, here is the % change in commercial electricity use from 2019-2020.

It’s important to acknowledge the limitations to this analysis. There are certain counties that PG&E does not have data for, like Palo Alto for example. I’m curious about why Alameda and Santa Clara counties (among others) are also missing.

This also assumes that no other major changes occured between 2017 and 2020 that would affect energy distribution around the Bay. In reality, people move in and out of the area, between zipcodes, and businesses move as well. Additionally, weather and climate factors may affect electricty and gas usage across different years. For example, a particularly cold spell one year could increase that year’s average electricity use and throw off the change calculations. It is also notable how the various metrics for electricity use and change (per household, total, percent difference) alter the maps in sometimes important ways. This brings into question what is the “best” way to represent the effects of COVID.